iconLogo
Published:2025/8/23 1:36:04

TikTok&YouTubeの科学発信、ジェンダー格差ってホント?👩‍🔬💻

超要約:TikTokとYouTubeでの科学発信、女性は不利?プラットフォームごとの違いを分析するよ!

✨ ギャル的キラキラポイント ✨ ● YouTubeとTikTok、それぞれの特徴で発信のされ方が違うってコト! ● 女性科学者は、男性より「いいね!」とかの反応が少ない傾向にあるらしい🥺 ● IT業界も、この問題に気づいて、対策を考えてるんだって!すごい!

詳細解説 ● 背景 科学の情報発信(サイエンスコミュニケーション)が大事になってるけど、YouTubeとTikTokじゃ、見られ方とか反応が違うんだよね。女性の科学者とか発信者は、男性より不利な状況があるみたい。

● 方法 YouTubeとTikTokで、どんな人がどんな情報を発信してるのか、性別の違いでどう反応が違うのかを調べたんだって。どんなプラットフォームが良いのか、AIとかも使って分析してるみたい💡

続きは「らくらく論文」アプリで

The Gender Gap in Science Communication on TikTok and YouTube: How Platform Dynamics Shape the Visibility of Female Science Communicators

Maider Eizmendi-Iraola / Sim\'on Pe\~na-Fern\'andez / Jordi Morales-i-Gras

Social media platforms facilitate the dissemination of science and access to it. However, gender inequalities in the participation and visibility of communicators persist. This study examined the differences in reach and audience response between YouTube and TikTok from a gender perspective. To do so, the ten most influential science accounts on YouTube and TikTok were selected, with the sample divided equally between men and women, to conduct a comparative study. A total of 4293 videos on TikTok and 4825 on YouTube were analyzed, along with 277,528 comments, considering metrics of views and interaction. The results show that on YouTube, men received more likes and views, while on TikTok, audience response was more balanced. The participation of women on both platforms also had a differential impact, as the number of women engaging with content on YouTube negatively correlated with interaction levels, whereas on TikTok, their impact was slightly positive. In conclusion, TikTok emerges as a more inclusive space for scientific communication, though structural challenges remain on both platforms, encouraging further research into strategies that promote gender equity in online science communication.

cs / cs.SI